Question of the Week 15 (part two)
SEND Reforms:
📢 Proposed SEND Reforms – Q16: Making Individual Support Plans practical and useful
The government is asking:
👉 How can Individual Support Plans (ISPs) be made clear, concise, and practical for professionals to use?
📊 Quick poll:
Do support plans actually work in practice when staff use them day-to-day in the classroom?
👍 Yes – they are clear and followed consistently
❤️ Sometimes – it depends on the member of staff
😢 Not really – they are too vague or inconsistent
😡 No – they are not used properly in practice
The aim is for plans to:
- be easier for staff to use day-to-day
- reduce repeated paperwork
- improve consistency between schools and settings
- help support continue more smoothly during transitions
But many families may be wondering:
- How do we make sure plans are short without losing important detail?
- Will all staff actually read and follow them consistently?
- How can support stay consistent between teachers, schools, and colleges?
- Will digital plans improve things—or create new problems?
You might want to share:
- What makes a support plan actually useful?
- What wording should never be used? (e.g. “as needed”)
- What would help support stay consistent across staff and settings?
- What should happen if support in the plan is not followed?
Your experiences will feed into our response to Q.16 in the SEND Reform Consultation 
Follow the link to see the original post on our Facebook Group
